🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The tide has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is celebrated is a indication of the political moment. How it evolves is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to state that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a colossal assault against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to scrub African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of former accomplishments, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an time that has been ineffective.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an foundation that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and leaves space for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the past when it ignores the current situation of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to subtle slights, but confronted with the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Black History is Now Month.