🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.